Detailing World  

Go Back   Detailing World > General Off Topic > Off Topic Chat
DW Home Forum Home Merchandise Store Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 23-10-2019, 04:32 PM   #61
Shug
OCD Sufferer (Obsessive Car Detailer)
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Edinburgh
Posts: 1,937
Thanks: 118
Thanked 737 Times in 496 Posts
In February 2007, a number of sources, including the British newspaper The Guardian, reported that the AEI had sent letters to scientists offering $10,000 plus travel expenses and additional payments, asking them to critique the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report

Throughout its history, The Washington Times has been known for its conservative political stance.[6][7][8][9] It has drawn controversy for publishing racist content, including commentary and conspiracy theories about United States president Barack Obama[10][11] and support for neo-Confederatism.[12] It has published material promoting Islamophobia.[13] It has published many columns which reject the scientific consensus on climate change,[14][15][16] as well as on ozone depletion[17] and on the harmful effects of second-hand smoke.

Not a stellar endorsement of their objectivity
Shug is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 23-10-2019, 07:11 PM   #62
Juke_Fan
OCD Sufferer (Obsessive Car Detailer)
 
Juke_Fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Telford, Shropshire.
Posts: 1,246
Thanks: 1,093
Thanked 674 Times in 538 Posts
Garage
For the interests of completeness, I didn't choose these links for any particular purpose, I hadn't heard about this so googled "500 climate change scientists who wrote to the UN telling them there was no climate change emergency" and these came up.

Lots more out there if anyone is interested.
Juke_Fan is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Juke_Fan For This Useful Post:
millns84 (23-10-2019)
Old 23-10-2019, 10:41 PM   #63
millns84
OCD Sufferer (Obsessive Car Detailer)
 
millns84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Offerton, Stockport
Posts: 4,779
Thanks: 3,404
Thanked 2,851 Times in 2,110 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shug View Post
In February 2007, a number of sources, including the British newspaper The Guardian, reported that the AEI had sent letters to scientists offering $10,000 plus travel expenses and additional payments, asking them to critique the IPCC Fourth Assessment Report

Throughout its history, The Washington Times has been known for its conservative political stance.[6][7][8][9] It has drawn controversy for publishing racist content, including commentary and conspiracy theories about United States president Barack Obama[10][11] and support for neo-Confederatism.[12] It has published material promoting Islamophobia.[13] It has published many columns which reject the scientific consensus on climate change,[14][15][16] as well as on ozone depletion[17] and on the harmful effects of second-hand smoke.

Not a stellar endorsement of their objectivity
Objectivity... The Guardian...

But, here it is on the very objective Guardian too, albeit that the article attempts to undermine the letter.

https://www.theguardian.com/environm...limate-science

Last edited by millns84; 23-10-2019 at 10:43 PM.
millns84 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to millns84 For This Useful Post:
Juke_Fan (24-10-2019)
Old 27-10-2019, 10:37 PM   #64
kh904
OCD Sufferer (Obsessive Car Detailer)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 943
Thanks: 8,330
Thanked 1,191 Times in 811 Posts
Climtate change is normal/cyclical.
Piers Corbyn (Jeremy Corbyn's brother), has rubbished man made climate change for a good while now. I recommed everyone view his evidence.
There are many climate scientists do not agree with the current view of man made climate, but anyone who challenges the narrative struggle with funding.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B-cIhjJDj3g
kh904 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to kh904 For This Useful Post:
-Kev- (16-11-2019), millns84 (28-10-2019)
Old 30-10-2019, 03:08 PM   #65
suds
OCD Sufferer (Obsessive Car Detailer)
 
suds's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Isle of Ynys Mon
Posts: 2,064
Thanks: 791
Thanked 949 Times in 712 Posts
Garage
I thought cows were the major polluters? (According to an article in 'Sheep farming monthly')
suds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 30-10-2019, 03:21 PM   #66
Sam6er
OCD Sufferer (Obsessive Car Detailer)
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: England
Posts: 1,003
Thanks: 623
Thanked 447 Times in 355 Posts
Now its people with Asthma causing climate change lol (Their inhalers apparently cause as much damage as the cows do)
Cant imagine the pollution an asthmatic cow gives off

Last edited by Sam6er; 30-10-2019 at 03:24 PM.
Sam6er is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-10-2019, 07:46 AM   #67
TonyH38
OCD Sufferer (Obsessive Car Detailer)
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Welling, Kent
Posts: 2,286
Thanks: 1,798
Thanked 917 Times in 833 Posts
Over population.
TonyH38 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 31-10-2019, 09:59 AM   #68
millns84
OCD Sufferer (Obsessive Car Detailer)
 
millns84's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Offerton, Stockport
Posts: 4,779
Thanks: 3,404
Thanked 2,851 Times in 2,110 Posts
Couple of articles out over the last few days regarding an "explosion" (hyperbole much?) in sea ice prompting a new ice age... Better get those CO2 levels up or we'll freeze eh?

Makes all the Phd's predicting that we'd have no ice caps by 2012 look a bit silly now. But then, it's not about that... It's a tax scam/control.
millns84 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to millns84 For This Useful Post:
-Kev- (16-11-2019)
Old 31-10-2019, 11:06 AM   #69
RS3
Orbital Oracle
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: West Yorkshire
Posts: 628
Thanks: 574
Thanked 373 Times in 267 Posts
There is no doubt we contribute to climate change but I am very dubious as to the answers that are presented to us such as electric cars which are no kinder to the environment and some will argue much worse.
I think the west is using climate change as a polital lever to reduce our love of oil, most of which comes from the middle east. The oil trade prevents wars breaking out (The west are avoiding wars with the likes of Iran because of the fear of oil shortages).
I believe the elephant in the room is unsustainable population growth. As long as the 3rd world & China etc are recreating at the rate that they are, our efforts will be completely worthless.
I also have faith in mankind to overcome such issues eventually. For me, I want to see more investment in Space travel. Regardless of climate, we need to learn how to get off this planet anyway if humanity is going to survive.
I don't support groups such as Extinction Rebellion as they are just full of worst case scenario's which when added up spell disaster in 10 - 15 years. This is just bull**** that must be challenged and those who cause others so much hardship when sat in the middle of one of Londons bridges should be carted off and locked up IMO.
RS3 is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to RS3 For This Useful Post:
rob267 (31-10-2019), shycho (16-11-2019)
Old 16-11-2019, 04:32 AM   #70
Venkman
Washmitt Meister
 
Venkman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 179
Thanks: 22
Thanked 98 Times in 84 Posts
As a geologist I regularly listen to presentations by climate scientists at conferences. Whilst I'm not a climate scientist, there is clear evidence that humans are contributing to climate change. Over the last 800,000 years global CO2 has fluctuated between 200-300 ppm (parts per million). In 2019 the value is 415 ppm. By 2100, climate models predict 900 ppm (a prediction, not certainty). This goes way beyond the normal cyclicity related to periodic heating-cooling of the earth, so much so that we have a new geological time period called the 'Anthropocene' where the activity of humans is the main factor driving climate change. The biggest problem is that this hasn't happened before whilst humans have populated the planet (and for the reasons it is occurring now, i.e. human induced), so predicting what will happen in the future and on what timescale is extremely difficult.

I agree with posts that have highlighted that anthropogenic climate change and what the government decides to do in Westminster regarding taxes/road rules are entirely unrelated. I also get annoyed with unsubstantiated, unscientific scaremongering that only serves to muddy the waters and divert attention from where it is needed.
Venkman is offline   Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Venkman For This Useful Post:
roscopervis (19-11-2019), shycho (16-11-2019)
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 06:28 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
DTO Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

vB.Sponsors
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2020, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
DTO Garage vBulletin Plugins by Drive Thru Online, Inc.

vB.Sponsors